🤖

AI Security Agents

Meet the advanced AI systems that power our smart contract security analysis. Each agent specializes in different aspects of security, working together to provide comprehensive vulnerability detection.

5 Specialized AI Models
94% Average Accuracy
Multi-Network Support

Our AI Security Team

🧠

OpenAI GPT-4

Primary Security Analyzer

Specialization

Comprehensive vulnerability detection and code analysis

Performance

Accuracy94%
Avg Speed~8 seconds
Coverage250+ vulnerability types

Key Strengths

  • Advanced pattern recognition for complex vulnerabilities
  • Natural language explanation of security issues
  • Contextual understanding of business logic flaws

Core Capabilities

Static code analysisLogic vulnerability detectionGas optimization suggestions+2 more
🔍

Deepseek Coder

Code Structure Specialist

Specialization

Architectural analysis and dependency security

Performance

Accuracy91%
Avg Speed~6 seconds
Coverage180+ architectural issues

Key Strengths

  • Deep architectural pattern analysis
  • Dependency vulnerability detection
  • Code quality and maintainability assessment

Core Capabilities

Contract architecture analysisImport/dependency securityUpgrade pattern validation+2 more
🔮

Mistral

Economic Security Validator

Specialization

Economic attack vectors and incentive analysis

Performance

Accuracy89%
Avg Speed~12 seconds
Coverage85+ economic vulnerabilities

Key Strengths

  • Game theory and incentive mechanism analysis
  • Economic attack vector identification
  • Token economics security validation

Core Capabilities

Economic exploit detectionIncentive alignment validationFlash loan attack analysis+2 more
🤖

ZerePy

Sonic Network Expert

Sonic Specialist

Specialization

Sonic blockchain-specific optimizations and security

Performance

Accuracy96%
Avg Speed~5 seconds
Coverage120+ Sonic-specific issues

Key Strengths

  • Sonic-specific vulnerability patterns
  • Network optimization recommendations
  • Sonic Opera compatibility analysis

Core Capabilities

Sonic-specific security patternsOpera consensus considerationsSonic VM optimization+2 more

LineaLens

Linea Network Expert

Linea Specialist

Specialization

Linea-specific security patterns and optimizations

Performance

Accuracy93%
Avg Speed~7 seconds
Coverage95+ Linea-specific issues

Key Strengths

  • Linea EVM implementation specifics
  • zkEVM security considerations
  • Linea bridge security analysis

Core Capabilities

Linea-specific vulnerability detectionzkEVM compatibility validationL2 security pattern analysis+2 more

How Multi-AI Analysis Works

Our revolutionary approach combines multiple AI models to achieve unprecedented accuracy in smart contract security analysis.

1

Parallel Analysis

Each AI model analyzes the contract independently, bringing unique perspectives and specialized knowledge.

2

Cross-Validation

Findings are cross-referenced between models to eliminate false positives and confirm real vulnerabilities.

3

Consensus Building

Models "discuss" findings through advanced consensus algorithms to reach agreement on severity and recommendations.

4

Unified Report

Final analysis combines insights from all models with confidence scores and actionable remediation steps.

🤖

Interactive AI Demo

Click "Watch AI Demo" above to see our multi-AI system in action analyzing a smart contract.

Demo includes live progress tracking and real-time AI model coordination.

AI Analysis Workflow

📄
Step 1: Source Code Extraction
Contract source code is retrieved from blockchain explorers and parsed for analysis.
🧠
Step 2: Initial AI Modeling
Multiple AI models independently analyze the source code for different types of vulnerabilities.
🔍
Step 3: Vulnerability Detection
AI models identify potential security issues and categorize them by severity and type.
🔄
Step 4: Cross-Validation
Results from various AI models are compared to reduce false positives and establish consensus.
📊
Step 5: Code Flow Analysis
Execution paths and state transitions are evaluated to identify complex security issues.
🛠️
Step 6: Remediation Generation
AI models propose concrete fixes for each identified vulnerability.
📋
Step 7: Final Report Compilation
Analysis results are summarized and organized into a comprehensive security report.
Need to know more?

Each step of our analysis employs specialized AI techniques. The entire process typically takes 20-45 seconds depending on contract complexity.

AI Analysis Agents

🧠OpenAI GPT-4
🔍Deepseek Coder
🔮Mistral
🤖ZerePy
LineaLens

AI Consensus Simulation

🤝Multi-AI Consensus Analysis

AI Consensus Strength:

73% Agreement Across Models
🔧
🔧
🔮
🤖
🔧

5 AI Models Analyzed

AI Model Comparison

Select Models to Compare

🧠
OpenAI GPT-4
94% accuracy
Static code analysisLogic vulnerability detection
🔍
Deepseek Coder
91% accuracy
Contract architecture analysisImport/dependency security
🔮
Mistral
89% accuracy
Economic exploit detectionIncentive alignment validation
🤖
ZerePy
96% accuracy
Sonic-specific security patternsOpera consensus considerations
LineaLens
93% accuracy
Linea-specific vulnerability detectionzkEVM compatibility validation
🤖

Select Models to Compare

Choose 2 or more AI models above to see detailed performance comparisons

💡Comparison Tips
  • • Network-specific models (ZerePy, LineaLens) show higher accuracy on their target networks
  • • Speed varies based on analysis depth - faster isn't always better for security
  • • Coverage indicates the number of vulnerability types each model can detect
  • • Combining multiple models provides the most comprehensive analysis

AI Knowledge Base

Explore what our AI models know and can detect. Search through vulnerability types, best practices, and AI capabilities.

Reentrancy Attacks

External calls that allow malicious contracts to re-enter functions

HIGH
Common Examples:
  • CEI pattern violations
  • Cross-function reentrancy
  • Read-only reentrancy
Prevention:

Use checks-effects-interactions pattern and reentrancy guards

Detected by:
OpenAI GPT-4MythrilSlither

Integer Overflow/Underflow

Arithmetic operations that exceed variable limits

HIGH
Common Examples:
  • Unchecked math operations
  • SafeMath missing
  • Type casting issues
Prevention:

Use SafeMath library or Solidity 0.8+ built-in overflow protection

Detected by:
OpenAI GPT-4MythrilSlither

Access Control Issues

Functions missing proper authorization checks

CRITICAL
Common Examples:
  • Missing onlyOwner modifier
  • Role-based access bugs
  • Privilege escalation
Prevention:

Implement proper role-based access control with OpenZeppelin

Detected by:
OpenAI GPT-4SlitherSemgrep

Gas Optimization Issues

Inefficient code patterns that waste gas

LOW
Common Examples:
  • Unnecessary storage reads
  • Loop optimizations
  • Packing structs
Prevention:

Follow gas optimization best practices and use efficient data structures

Detected by:
Deepseek CoderSlither

Oracle Manipulation

Vulnerabilities in external data feeds

HIGH
Common Examples:
  • Price oracle attacks
  • Flash loan manipulation
  • MEV exploitation
Prevention:

Use multiple oracles, implement time delays, and sanity checks

Detected by:
MistralOpenAI GPT-4

Bridge Security Issues

Cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities

CRITICAL
Common Examples:
  • Double spending
  • Message replay attacks
  • Validator collusion
Prevention:

Implement proper validation, timeouts, and multi-sig requirements

Detected by:
LineaLensZerePyOpenAI GPT-4
6
Vulnerability Types
5
AI Models
95%
Detection Accuracy
📚Additional Resources
API Documentation - Technical details on our analysis endpoints
How It Works - Learn more about our AI analysis process
Try AI Analysis - Test our AI models on your contracts

AI Performance Metrics

Real-time monitoring of AI model performance and system health

🔍
Total Analyses
+12% vs last week
s
Avg Analysis Time
-8% vs last week
🎯
%
Accuracy Rate
+2.1% vs last week
🛡️
Vulnerabilities Found
+156 this week

AI Model Performance

ModelAccuracyAvg SpeedReliabilityCoverageTrendStatus
OpenAI GPT-4
94%
8.2s98.7%250 types📈Optimal
Deepseek Coder
91%
6.1s96.3%180 types📈Optimal
Mistral
89%
12.4s94.8%85 types➡️Good
ZerePy
96%
5.3s99.1%120 types📈Optimal
LineaLens
93%
7.8s97.2%95 types📈Optimal
🏥System Health
Uptime%
False Positive Rate%
Models Active/5
⚠️Recent Alerts
All systems operational
Mistral model updated
Scheduled maintenance 2h ago
📊Performance Insights
• Accuracy improved 2.1% this week
• Average analysis time reduced by 8%
• Zero critical system errors
• 99.2% model consensus rate
All AI models are currently operational and performing optimally
Last updated: 12:12:36 PM

Technical Architecture

Lightning Fast

Parallel processing enables analysis completion in 20-45 seconds, regardless of contract complexity.

  • • Concurrent AI execution
  • • Optimized model loading
  • • Smart caching layers
🎯

High Accuracy

Multi-model consensus reduces false positives by 85% compared to single-model approaches.

  • • Cross-validation algorithms
  • • Confidence scoring
  • • Specialized model training
🔄

Continuous Learning

Models are continuously updated with new vulnerability patterns and attack vectors.

  • • Real-time pattern updates
  • • Community feedback integration
  • • Exploit database sync

Experience AI-Powered Security

Ready to see how our AI agents can secure your smart contracts? Try our advanced analysis tools today.